Science confirms that people absorb energy from others

Have you ever in company with a person to hear a bad atmosphere, as if the person was stealing your energy?

"Everything is energy" is one of the main axioms of science, and human beings are no strangers to energy transformations.


An interesting study was conducted which shows that plants can absorb energy from other plants at the University of Bielefeld in Germany. Olivia Bader-Lee, a physician and therapist, has followed the results of this survey.





The science that studies the behavior of energy in living things is called bioenergetics.


This research was conducted in the algae, especially Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. It was discovered that in addition to photosynthesis, it has an alternative source of energy absorbing energy from other algae. The head of this research is the German biologist Olaf Kruse, and its results have been reported on Naturesite.com






According to Bader-Lee, our bodies are like sponges, they absorb the energy that is all around us. "This is exactly the reason why there are people who feel uncomfortable when they are in a group with a mixture of energy and emotions."


"The human body is very similar to a plant which absorbs the energy needed to power your emotional state, and can stimulate the cells and increase the amount of cortisol and catabolize, feeding the cells depending on the emotional need." Continued Bader- Lee.


This is why many people can change their state of mind: nervous, stressed, angry, anxious, sad, but also happy, upbeat and smiling.


Bader-Lee says that over the centuries, man has lost the connection with nature, in which the exchange of energy could bring enormous benefits to humanity.




Ultimately, the spirit is energy, and what we call "supernatural" is nothing but the manifestation of different energies in the world. This was known in ancient cultures on every continent, but science has decided to ignore it and only a few scientists have the courage to face these problems, for fear of criticism and rejection by the scientific community. 

Comments